Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 79.1 against 75.4. LG V30 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 and LG V30 count with very similar screens, because although the LG V30 has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a bit larger screen.
LG V30 features a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30 also has more RAM. The LG V30 features as much storage for applications and games as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and equal internal memory capacity.
LG V30 takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much worse 16 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better battery life than LG V30, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.