Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 75.4. The LG V60 ThinQ body is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it is extremely heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a larger aperture to take better images in low-light environments, a back camera with a much better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.