Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-10-20 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting an 84.2 score against 75.4. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s design is a lot newer, just a little bit lighter and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a camera with more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.