Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a 91.8 score against 75.4. Even though Galaxy A71 5G is a little heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's thinner and also way newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way more mega-pixels camera and a bigger aperture. Galaxy A71 5G features longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3760mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.