Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is way better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better screen pixel density. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy A90 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.