Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a global score of 81 against 75.4. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is newer and a lot thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Galaxy C9 Pro's CPU is very similar to the processor in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.