Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having an 88 score against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy M31s construction is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features just a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has 3 GB more RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M31s shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M31s also has a lot better resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.