Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having an 87.1 score against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it is also somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note9 has a screen that is just as good as the display in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although the Galaxy Note9 has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a larger display.
The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has 3 GB more RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note9 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note9, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.