Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 overall score. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a extremely thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although both were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little bit better display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little lower pixel quantity in each inch of display, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a little bigger display.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores (although slower). Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.