Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-10-17 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ3 is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a 79.6 score against 75.4. Sony Xperia XZ3's construction is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Xperia XZ3 has a little more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a little larger display.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Sony Xperia XZ3 has just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a lower 19 megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a F2 aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.