Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 77.8 score against 75.4. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is extremely heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's incredibly thinner and also extremely newer. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite lower pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a way higher video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more mega pixels. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.