Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 global score. The vivo X60 Pro body is much newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it's also a bit heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has more memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X60 Pro has a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 12% greater battery size. The vivo X60 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments, a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.