Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-27 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's general score of 74.8. The Google Pixel 2 is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440, a quite larger screen and a quite greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 2 features a quite better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3760mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.