Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-27 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 74.8 score. The LG V20 is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's also a bit heavier. LG V20 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a sharper screen than LG V20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a quite better screen density. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 and the LG V20 count with similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have equal 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. LG V20 and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 count with quite similar cameras, because although the LG V20 has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V20 is also cheaper than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.