Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 88.1 score against 76.4. Apple iPhone X is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also extremely thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better screen than iPhone X, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone X has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a greater number of cores (but slower) and a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone X shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 44 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.