Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 82 against 76.4. The iPhone XR body is newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is just a little bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot higher pixel density.
Apple iPhone XR has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a larger number of cores and a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone XR shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The iPhone XR counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo features better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.