Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 76.4. The Apple iPhone XS design is way newer and much thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it's just a little bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a slightly better looking screen than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density and a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
IPhone XS features a bit better CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a 64-bit processor, a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Apple iPhone XS features just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
The Apple iPhone XS features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.