Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 77.1 score against 76.4. The Asus ROG Phone design is a lot newer and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Asus ROG Phone has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
Motorola Droid Turbo shoots much better photographs and videos than Asus ROG Phone, although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same video definition. Asus ROG Phone features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.