Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. Google Pixel's body is newer, somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter display than Google Pixel, because it has a greater pixel number in each screen inch, a bit larger screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F2 aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
Google Pixel counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.