Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. The Google Pixel 3 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also noticeably thinner and lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels quantity per inch in the display. Google Pixel 3 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory.
Motorola Droid Turbo features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has slower 24 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a camera with a much better 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Droid Turbo, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.