Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a way newer and much thinner cellphone than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it's also a bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs a bit more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.