Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 81.9 score against 76.4. The Google Pixel 4 construction is extremely newer, a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot higher 20.7 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.