Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer and noticeably thinner device than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it is also just a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel number per inch of display. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Droid Turbo takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 20.7 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.