Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 82.9 score against 76.4. The Google Pixel 4a is a way newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.