Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a general score of 87.5 against 76.4. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is noticeably newer, much thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less cores (but faster) and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G and Motorola Droid Turbo both count with very similar batteries duration, although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a 0 percent lower battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.