Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Google Pixel 5's body is newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Google Pixel 5 has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Google Pixel 5 features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4080mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh. Google Pixel 5 takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a camera with way less megapixels and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.