Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Huawei |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-01-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 775.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 78.7 score against 76.4. Huawei Mate 9 Pro's design is noticeably newer, just a little bit lighter and way thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit superior processor than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Huawei Mate 9 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Although Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.