Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has an overall score of 77, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. Both devices we are comparing here include Android operating system, but LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, providing you a couple additional features. The LG G7 Fit is a way newer cellphone, and it's also a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo.
LG G7 Fit has a screen that is just as good as Motorola Droid Turbo's screen, because although the LG G7 Fit has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo takes clearer videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a much higher 20.7 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture for better low light photos.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.