Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 82.5 score against 76.4. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. LG V30S ThinQ is a much newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little lower 2560 x 1440px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels amount in each inch of display. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Droid Turbo features longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
LG V30S ThinQ's camera is very similar to Motorola Droid Turbo's camera, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a much less megapixels back facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.