Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 81.3 score against 76.4. The LG V35 ThinQ is a way newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and much thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster). The LG V35 ThinQ takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.