Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 87.6 against 76.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The LG V60 ThinQ is a notably newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is also heavier.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster processor than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.