Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 87.1 score against 76.4. The LG Velvet construction is notably newer and notably thinner, but a little heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little faster processor than LG Velvet, because although it has less processing cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The LG Velvet features a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The LG Velvet has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG Velvet features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
LG Velvet is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.