Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an overall score of 85.3, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's design is newer and incredibly thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is much heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a way smaller display and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.