Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is much newer, noticeably thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has lesser RAM and 4 lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a slightly better screen than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a little bit worse 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and faster 30 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.