Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 87.1 against 76.4. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is notably newer and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels camera, a larger aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.