Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than the Moto Z Force, with a 76.4 score against 75.8. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Motorola Droid Turbo is an older, a bit heavier and way thicker device than Moto Z Force. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
The Moto Z Force captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a larger aperture, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with more megapixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.