Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Moto Z2 Play's construction is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo has a much more vibrant screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster) and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs in low light environments and slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 20.7 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo has improved battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a better device, it costs a bit more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.