Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a 77.6 score against 76.4. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, so it provides some nice extra features and better performance. The Motorola Moto Z3 body is much newer, incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better processing power than Moto Z3, because although it has less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better display than Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F2 aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.