Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than Moto Z3 Play, getting a general score of 76.4 against 76.3. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a older, a lot thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Moto Z3 Play. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a lot better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher screen pixels density. Motorola Droid Turbo captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Moto Z3 Play features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.