Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Motorola One Action's construction weights the same than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it is somewhat thinner. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better performance than Motorola One Action, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola One Action counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot better 20.7 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.