Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola One Hyper's body is notably newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a lot better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola One Hyper features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper captures better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations, a way more MP camera in the back and faster video frame rate.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.