Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. Motorola One Vision's construction is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but also a little heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola One Vision features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger diafragm aperture, higher video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.