Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a global score of 80 against 76.4. Even though the Motorola One Zoom is a little heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and a lot newer. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Zoom takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments, higher video frame rate and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola One Zoom has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Zoom counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.