Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a global score of 87 against 76.4. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is just a little heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's much thinner and extremely newer. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a lot better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch.
Motorola razr (2020) has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 39 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.