Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is noticeably heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and a lot newer.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo has a much sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixel count in each inch of screen.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a camera with way more MP, higher video frame rate and a larger camera aperture. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 32 GB more internal storage.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.