Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 76.4 against 76.4. The Nokia 9 PureView is a notably newer device, and it's also notably thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processor than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 17% bigger battery size. Motorola Droid Turbo captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.