Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. The Nokia XR20 is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is much heavier. Both phones we are comparing here use Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Nokia XR20 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4630mAh battery size.
Nokia XR20 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger camera aperture, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.