Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Motorola Droid Turbo design is lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although it is somewhat thicker and was released many years before. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster processor than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and 4 more cores. Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better count of pixels per display inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Motorola Droid Turbo not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.