Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a global score of 76.4 against 76.2. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Droid Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction is lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a lot better video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.