Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a general score of 79.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Galaxy A30's body is notably newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy A30 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A30, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy A30 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh. Motorola Droid Turbo captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.